Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxembourg–Ukraine relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 12:59, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Luxembourg–Ukraine relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination with no resident embassies. all relations between these 2 countries seem in the Ukraine-EU context. There's this and this but neither together make an article. LibStar (talk) 14:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I would have a hard time being convinced those news tidbits made the topic significant enough to be mentioned IN an article much less stand on its own as the notable topic OF an article. Luxembourg just isn't a very big country and some of these small countries just don't have extensive relations with all of the other 200 or so countries in the world.  We need to accept this as reality.  If Ukraine and Luxembourg forge some sort of notable relationship leave a message on my talk page and I'll help write about it. Drawn Some (talk) 16:01, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Embassy in neither country of the pair? Seems to be a long stretch to noatbility. Collect (talk) 16:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:01, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:01, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


 * not sure why this tag was placed here? in 6 days there has been zero improvement to article. LibStar (talk) 13:51, 8 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No reliable sources adress the lack of relations between these two nations in any detail. Hipocrite (talk) 18:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Don't need another of these articles that randomly pair countries. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:18, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Nick-D (talk) 08:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Article has no useful content and very little prospect for development – the relationship is not notable. No sources discuss these relations. Johnuniq (talk) 11:43, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete These random-nation 'ships are getting rather tiresome. Plutonium27 (talk) 18:02, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Wholly unremarkable. And can we ditch the superfluous boxes, please? When it was tagged is irrelevant, it's what comes of it at the end. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  04:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. Unnotable bilateralism. Eusebeus (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.