Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxembourg Digital Songs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Billboard charts.  MBisanz  talk 01:37, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Luxembourg Digital Songs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a minor chart with Billboard magazine relegated to a simple top 10 list, not easy to find on Billboard.biz and published bi-weekly on the back pages of the print edition. The chart itself has zero notability outside of Billboard and there is no third-party coverage of what songs reach number one on this chart. Billboard is a trade magazine and publishes a lot of charts, and I don't see a need for an article and lists for the non-notable ones. A mention on Billboard charts would seem to suffice here. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 07:56, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:30, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:30, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:30, 18 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 14:09, 23 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect all to Billboard (magazine), the parent article. Not notable enough to warrant separate articles, but redirects are cheap.-- xanchester  (t)  16:55, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I only think a redirect is appropriate, per xanchester, if the Billboard article is going to actually mention "Luxembourg Digital Songs". Otherwise delete an article not even notable enough to be mentioned in the article for its parent magazine.  Spinning  Spark  19:06, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Per Erick, redirect to Billboard charts.  Spinning Spark  00:44, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Billboard charts. Erick (talk) 20:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.