Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxury Buyers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Luxury Buyers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Neither this article nor a Google search shows independent third-party coverage of the company. This article reads promotionally, and a Google search turns up the usual hits on any company. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:48, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * '''Delete. Fails WP:NOTE and WP:CORPDEPTH. Serves only to advertise the company. SamHolt6 (talk) 03:54, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:05, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:07, 12 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: A promotionally-worded article which appears to have been referenced by just harvesting mention of the words "luxury buyers" rather than articles about the particular firm of this name. I see nothing to indicate attained notability for this venture. AllyD (talk) 07:13, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:SPIP and WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing ++ 16:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.