Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxury Card


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  03:20, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Luxury Card

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG. All existing sources are either PR pieces or covering the trademark lawsuit, which should be in the Centurion Card article instead. Also article is created by a single-purpose account. NM 11:26, 17 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:12, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. NM  11:26, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:45, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wyoming-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  16:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.