Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxury real estate brokerage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Chetblong T C 00:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Luxury real estate brokerage

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Dicdef and OR. Can't see how this can ever be usefully expanded beyond a dicdef because of the regional variations, which is currently pure OR. Travellingcari (talk) 21:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete -- not complete nonsense, but close to it. Dicdef, WP:OR, no cites. Non-notable topic.  See also WP:COATRACK. Bearian (talk) 01:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Darkspots (talk) 23:32, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Merely tossing an adjective in front of an existing title does NOT automatically make the new phrase notable, And given that the article creator was -- which helpfully included a link to their own website -- I think I can see the purpose here. --Calton | Talk 01:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SPAM and WP:COI, created by a user named Luxuryrealtygroup. Otherwise, it also is not notable and is filled with original research, but why even bother going into that? It's a clear COI violation. Doc Strange (talk) 14:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is a spam. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:35, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- per Doc Strange. Rigby27   Talk  14:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.