Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luzviminda Federal Republic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:26, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Luzviminda Federal Republic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article on supposed proposed name for the Philippines. However I cannot seem to find much online on "Luzviminda Federal Republic". The references provided all do not refer to the articles topic. Seems to be largely WP:OR and/or opinion Travelbird (talk) 03:47, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note:, by the same creator has precisely the same problems: the references support a great number of details in the article but not the actual main premise of the subject; no reliable material is found online. Note also that both "proposed states" were proposed by the same person at change.org. Is a separate AfD necessary? Or will an "also nominating" do? הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 04:06, 3 December 2012 (UTC)


 * A separate AfD is certainly not necessary. I am also nominating the following related pages, for the reasons I explain below:
 * JamesBWatson (talk) 13:16, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * JamesBWatson (talk) 13:16, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * JamesBWatson (talk) 13:16, 3 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete all. (1) There is no evidence of notability of any of these concepts, either in the references cited or anywhere else that I can find, and (2) the articles are purely promotional. Nearly all of the "references" do not even mention the topic of the article in which it appears, the few that do give no more than a passing mention of the subject, and I have not been able to find any coverage of them at all in any reliable third party source. The whole tenor and character of the articles is promotion of a point of view. Everything suggests that these articles were created to publicise the concepts. One of the articles says "Philippines Social Army (PSA) is a term coined by OFW who led the active blogging and social networking to spread the news..." and these Wikipedia articles seem to be further attempts to "spread the news". Another one of the articles attributes its subject to someone called "Prince Dan We". both occur together as contributors to two blogs, and both appear in various social network sites etc, but I can find no evidence of anything satisfying our reliable sources requirements. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:16, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:43, 7 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete all Either hoaxes or purely promotional stuff that shouldn't be here. – H T  D  03:36, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete all as being purely promotional and possible hoaxes. Only sources are unreliable websites. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:15, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete all promotional in tone and not notable at all--Wakowako (talk) 07:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.