Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyann Nguyen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Pinging as requested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Lyann Nguyen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

UPE, non-notable subject, promotional SEO garbage. The only source that might establish any sort of notability is the ibtimes.sg article, and that has no byline and looks to me like an advertorial/press release disguised as an article, the rest are either lists of patents, interviews, or are entirely unrelated to her. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)


 *  Delete Non of the sources are authorative look like small blogs or paid articles. --James Richards (talk) 15:02, 28 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. As with the current AfD for Creditninja, there's clearly some kind of Coi editing going on here. The page's creator has been perma-banned and I can't find anything that would pass WP:NBIO. This is precisely why WP:NOTLINKEDIN was created. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 15:54, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable businesswoman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. If the closing admin would be so kind, please ping me when this is closed so that I can delete the wikidata item (came here after the item was listed at wikidata's requests for deletion, where the deletion is on hold given that it currently has a valid site link) --DannyS712 (talk) 22:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 15:56, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.