Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lycaon (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 00:22, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Lycaon (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A search for this band turns up nothing at all. Just directory listings and youtube videos. Ridernyc (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 13:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 13:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete. Not seeing any in-depth third-party sourcing or coverage to demonstrate notability. --DAJF (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. The band has charted multiple times for both singles and albums, with the highest single coming in at 41 and the highest album at 48. This satisfies criterion number 2 of WP:BAND.　With a few online articles (, , etc.) and indications they regularly appear in the visual kei press , I believe they pass notability criteria. Michitaro (talk) 23:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 05:54, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.