Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyn Parker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  15:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Lyn Parker

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Routine coverage here fails WP:GNG. Uhooep (talk) 19:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. No SIGCOV. All sources in the article are unsuitable: source 1 is Who's Who, which is unreliable, source 2 is basically a CV, and source 3 is a Downing Street memo. 〜 Festucalex  •  talk  07:05, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete As per source assessment above. Lacking independent sources to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 08:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agree with nominator; fails WP:GNG with no secondary sources. User:Let'srun 21:59, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - I wonder if a redirect to List of ambassadors of the United Kingdom to the Netherlands would be worthwhile as it is conceivable people might search for the subject in connection with that post. Dunarc (talk) 21:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC) Amended by Dunarc (talk) 21:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 * But that is not the only thing s he is known for. S he's also been high commissioner to Cyprus. LibStar (talk) 00:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Fair point - he did hold both roles and it is not clear one is more important than the other (and also his position at the ICC would also be a conceivable reason for searching). Given the importance of all 3 roles and is odd that there are not more sources covering him, though this can sometimes happen with diplomats. Dunarc (talk) 20:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete The nominator lays out a good case, so I won’t repeat, but this article does not meet WP:GNG criterion and should be deleted unless more substantial RS news coverage can be found. Go4thProsper (talk) 01:44, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:17, 23 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.