Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynn Loscutoff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Wifione  Message 01:00, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Lynn Loscutoff

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Can not find significant coverage in reliable sources. Sources only mention the subject in passing (i.e. quotes from her as director of The Copley Society of Boston) or as part of routine coverage (i.e. announcements about art exhibits). Outside of her personal website, the source that covers the subject the most in-depth is an article about the wives of Boston Celtics players. As notability is not inherited, there does not appear to be enough for a standalone article. Hirolovesswords (talk) 16:40, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:21, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:29, 30 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - The references appear to discuss a gallery that the subject may have directed or to the general art scene in which the subject may have participated. The article and one reference also relate to the subject's husband and WP:NOTINHERIT would preclude that as supporting notability.--Rpclod (talk) 18:19, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dearth of references. Searched 10 SERP pages, no in-depth sources, only scattered mentions. Good watercolorist. While pageviews is not an official indication, the lack of attention (for me) is a further indication of lack of notability, meaning no need to search the second set of 10 SERP pages.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:43, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.