Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynn Sonberg (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Lynn Sonberg
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unref blp. Went to AfD in 2011 - no consensus. I'm hoping we can establish a consensus this time, or delete as unref blps aren't allowed. Boleyn (talk) 19:16, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete I've been able to access the book review of A Horse Named Paris mentioned in DGG's comment at the end of the 1st deletion discussion. It's only about five sentences, some of which is a plot summary, and in my opinion, doesn't represent significant coverage of the subject.  Another review of The Health Nutrient Bible is only slightly more substantial.  These reviews are in the School Library Journal and the Library Journal respectively.  I'm not really convinced that these reviews support the notability guidelines for authors, and do not constitute very strong support for the general notability guideline, either.  I, Jethrobot  drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 20:30, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete I don't see anything notable that clearly supports WP:AUTHOR.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:36, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:44, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:44, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.