Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynne McNamara


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  05:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Lynne McNamara

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:NACTOR for merely being a film extra. LibStar (talk) 05:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism,  and Canada. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:27, 4 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete Citations are non-significant and/or routine coverage. Fails GNG. Macktheknifeau (talk) 11:28, 5 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. As always, neither journalists nor actors are "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to show that their work has garnered third party media coverage and analysis about it which would satisfy WP:GNG. But the sourcing here isn't cutting it: three of the footnotes are primary sources that aren't support for notability at all (i.e. journalists do not qualify for Wikipedia articles just because they have or had staff profiles on the self-published websites of their own employers); one is a dead link from a small community hyperlocal that can't be recovered in order to verify how much it did or didn't actually say about her; and the two acceptable live footnotes are both just glancing namechecks of her existence, one in the context of providing soundbite in an article on a subject that isn't her, and the other in the context of winning a minor local award that isn't prominent enough to confer an instant inclusion freebie in and of itself. Bearcat (talk) 15:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.