Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynne Naylor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:27, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Lynne Naylor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable artist with no sources. A Google search turns up nothing except her own site and this article. Beerest355 Talk 18:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Beerest355  Talk 18:28, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Beerest355  Talk 18:28, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Beerest355  Talk 18:28, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Beerest355  Talk 18:28, 29 June 2013 (UTC)


 * delete as per above. Jamesx12345 (talk) 20:18, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:16, 6 July 2013 (UTC)




 * Redirect to Spümcø, as she was a co-founder of the company. My actual feel, is that she likely passes notability per WP:CREATIVE based on point 1, but I'm just not finding enough sources to establish this.  IMDB is not a reliable source but there's little reason to doubt that she nominated for awards which is a form of peer recognition.  Her work in character design is acknowledged here.  And she is verifiably a cofounder of Spümcø.  I'm going with a redirect as the sourcing just isn't enough for me to move to a keep. -- Whpq (talk) 16:54, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.