Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lysogen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. DS (talk) 17:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Lysogen
The article appears to be merely a dictionary definition, which conflicts with WP:NOT. &mdash; X  S  G  04:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article is more than just a definition, and is linked from a number of other articles. --Eastmain (talk) 05:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Even though it does not at the moment, the article could provide much more than a dictionary definition, and is not merely a definition now. Kakofonous (talk) 05:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  12:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is already more than a definition, the topic is clearly encyclopedic and has plenty of room for expansion. See WP:STUB. Note to nominator: in the future, please use an appropriate edit summary when nominating an article for deletion, as explained in step I of AFD. --Itub (talk) 11:58, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Noted. &mdash;  X    S    G   16:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.