Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M&M's Break' Em


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 18:44, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

M&M's Break' Em

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unnotable video game, didn't receive high critical acclaim. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:52, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per About.com, IGN, GameZone, and Polygamia. SL93 (talk) 03:04, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: It is a game in it's own right. It may not have a lot of info now but that is the point. Now we have a place to add more. Like most games that are all sighted on here, it will have the relevant info after it is amassed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WandererTheLost (talk • contribs) 10:12, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment - Here's another source at Impulse Gamers. I'm not familiar with the website (Looks like WP:VG/S isn't either.) but I thought I'd throw it out there and let others decide if it helps. Currently neutral on this; the sourcing is weak, but its debateable, one could argue it meets the GNG. The nomination statement about it not achieving "critical acclaim" is irrelevant though, that's not a requirement for a game to have an article... Sergecross73   msg me   17:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Barely scrapes by as far as sources to meet the WP:GNG. Looks like a terrible, poorly conceived, marketing-gimmick of a game, but that doesn't matter, the coverage does. Since the game was widely published on a very popular video game platform, there's likely to be other sources out there too, like in print magazines. Sergecross73   msg me   13:30, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.