Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mélanie Paquin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:07, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Mélanie Paquin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person per WP:BLP1E. Won a single beauty pageant...and the majority of this stub article is fluff. Unlikely to ever be expanded or improved. Kelly hi! 13:37, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete So it seems this article was created because Paquin preceded Teng as Miss Canada. No long term notability or significance. Again another rather off-putting article painting an individual in the Teng Universe as the Second Coming of Christ AusLondonder (talk) 21:29, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  22:16, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  22:16, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Inquiry : Per answers below. Being Miss Canada confers notability per GNG as a national-level pageant Do we routinely do articles on the individuals winning Miss America and Miss USA?  If so, why treat Canadians differently?  (If not, then carry on and never mind).   Montanabw (talk)  23:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep And we do. BLP is sourced, and I think deleting a slew of "female BLPs" is not a super great aim.  We even have full contestant lists by state for Miss America! (And an unlinked list for Miss Guam winners.   Canada is clearly "not worth noticing"  I fear. Collect (talk) 01:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Perhaps some of those should be deleted then, User:Collect? To suggest though that some anti-Canadian bias is taking place here is blatantly wrong and misleading. AusLondonder (talk) 02:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * In case you missed it - my comment was directed at 's comments, and not in any way designed to be dismissive of Canada or overly laudatory of Canada - and your statement that my post was blatantly false and misleading is something I ask you to redact. Collect (talk) 02:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * My response was to this "Canada is clearly "not worth noticing" I fear". How could you get that mixed up? AusLondonder (talk) 03:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * You appear to totally miss the comment at which that was quite obviously directed:  If so, why treat Canadians differently? Collect (talk) 13:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - Miss Canada is a top-level pageant (akin to national championship title in sports) and thus she has earned notability. Article should be defluffed. —Мандичка YO 😜 05:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Pages on women are important. This one is notable. I noticed this a the BLP page. See Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard. I hope people do not nominate for deletion articles on women. QuackGuru  ( talk ) 12:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep from what I can gather, this pageant is similar to Miss America and is top-level, so this individual surely meets notability. White Arabian mare  ( Neigh ) 19:03, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as subject appears to cross the verifiability and notability thresholds. - Dravecky (talk) 11:28, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Winning Miss Canada is a strong claim to notability, but "works as a bartender" for someone with a very thin biographical article is hardly a compelling rationale for keeping. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 01:20, 14 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.