Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mónica Puig


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:19, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Mónica Puig

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails Tennis notabilty as per here KnowIG (talk) 14:44, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails notability criteria for tennis players. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  15:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable enough Someone65 (talk) 16:09, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes WP:TENNIS/N since she has been in the top 3 (No. 2) of the junior ITF (World Ranking). She should also pass the 2nd criterion of the guideline based on the gold medal that she had won in the tennis women's singles event at last year's Central American and Caribbean Games. Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 16:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per Arteyu. she is currently 6th in the juniors itf ranking: .-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:50, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Please learn the notablity of junior players regarding ranking. Thank you KnowIG (talk) 18:11, 23 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per Capricopia. Was ITF Junior ranking #4 as of Jan 24, 2011 and was finalist today in Australian Open girls, which should move ranking into #3 or better, yes?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Capricopia (talk • contribs) 08:11, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with Capricopia. Puig has made news headlines in recent tennis competitions. --XLR8TION (talk) 23:16, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.