Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M.O.C.K.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE as gibberish and a personal attack. &mdash; J I P | Talk 18:20, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

M.O.C.K.
Your basic "stream of conscience" nonsense. Bookandcoffee 05:51, 5 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - as noted. --Bookandcoffee 05:51, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete the radio from under my fingernails! Mo0 [ talk ] 05:53, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, or better yet speedy delete under criterion A6 ("Articles which serve no purpose but to disparage their subject") or as patent nonsense, definition 2, "Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to make sense of it." --DavidConrad 05:59, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. *drew 06:06, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Nonsense. Attack. And throw in stupidity while we are at it. (We should have a CSD for stupidity.) &spades;DanMS 06:25, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 *  . as above. -- WB 06:44, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G1 ... and I think you meant "stream of consciousness". howcheng   [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 06:44, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * ...yeah that's what I meant! (And the sad thing is I had to spell check it before I put it up. :) --Bookandcoffee 16:41, 5 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.