Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M.U.K


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:08, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

M.U.K

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article has been unsourced and blatantly promotional since at least 2013, but on top of that, this person doesn't seem to pass WP:ARTIST, although I'm not entirely sure. The magazine article in the external link section could be significant coverage (but it's unclear to me whether this magazine itself is in any way notable) and I can't find anything else online. Lennart97 (talk) 21:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 21:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 21:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 21:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete GNG fail. All I see in a search are Pokemon items, and a site that says M.U.K. means Marine Utility Knife. This is basically unsourced self-promotion. --- Possibly (talk) 21:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - As a visual artist his name seems to have different permutations, with different numbers of periods from zero to three (this article title uses two), and those generate a few search results but they are basic directory listings and self-uploads. The article says he has released albums under the names "Fre(e)d, in solo" and "Moontain" and I can find nothing on those except basic social media entries. Some of the listed albums have been self-uploaded to Bandcamp and the like. None of the above satisfy WP's rules for reliable sources or significant coverage. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 02:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails in GNG, not enough sources. GooeyMitch (talk) 18:47, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete this fails GNG by miles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:53, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete   fails WP:GNG  Devoke  water  20:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.