Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. Alan Kazlev


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 11:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

M. Alan Kazlev
An "amateur" with an "extensive website" fails WP:BIO. Leibniz 14:38, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: the website may meet the standards of WP:WEB in which case I think a Move would be more appropriate. Antonrojo 15:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - looks like a crank, fails by any reasonable definition of notability. Pete Fenelon 00:38, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 16:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Primarilly relisting because the AfD tag was apprently never added to the article. --W.marsh 16:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BIO. scope_creep 16:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Crackpots need to cause quite a stir in order to be notable enough for inclusion. I see no stir. Caknuck 16:25, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per A7 Missvain 17:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment "looks like a crank"..."Crackpots need to cause quite a stir"...these comments amount to: 'I disagree with his ideology; therefore this article should be deleted.' &mdash; goethean &#2384; 20:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Certainly a crank. Delete as failing WP:RS. Ohconfucius 02:04, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. RFerreira 06:23, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete in agreement with Pete Fenelon SSS108 talk-email 07:06, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: I do not see anything notable about Alan Kazlev. Many people have websites and are not listed on Wikipedia as "notable." Many people are critics of others and are not considered notable simply because they are critics. And Kazlev is not a published author. Freelanceresearch 05:21, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.