Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. Macha Nightmare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles 11:35, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

M. Macha Nightmare

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Long-term undersourced BLP of little or no notability. The Wordsmith Communicate 06:50, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:40, 3 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. While part one of your deletion reason is correct, part two isn't, as she is clearly notable. She is interviewed by newspapers (San Francisco Chronicle and a number of behind-the-paywall articles), is given as a reference repeatedly in Introduction to pagan studies (further reading of chapter 4 has three books, one cowritten by her) and has an entry in The Gale encyclopedia of the unusual and unexplained. This is just going to a few of the many sources available, people interested in the subject could probably find a lot more still in the 1260 Google Books results... Fram (talk) 10:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: After a quick look, I agree with Fram.--Milowent • talkblp-r  16:04, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: I think this author is notable, and getting more notable all the time. The article could probably use some updating, but IMO deserves to be improved rather than deleted. Rosencomet (talk) 05:53, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.