Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. P. Vijayakumar (civil servant)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 03:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

M. P. Vijayakumar (civil servant)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

here is very lessevidence of notability provided for this person. This article does not provide enough good quality references.it uses weasel words.Editors have a WP:CoI regarding the subject matter (Harishrawat11 (talk) 09:54, 2 November 2012 (UTC))
 * Comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 2.  KTC (talk) 10:06, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: There are definite NPOV issues, especially considering Vijayakumar was charged with contempt of court in 2004. Frankly the article itself could use a lot of work in terms of correct English. However, he was clearly an important political figure in Chennai for some time. I do think we have notability here. Faustus37 (talk) 10:31, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Selective merge to Activity-based learning in India and Tamil Nadu (Redirect to Activity-based learning in India), per WP:BASIC, with no disrespect to M. P. Vijayakumar's achievements. I found a few additional refs, but (combined with those within they article) they don't look to me enough to warrant/sustain an article, which may explain why the 'Early career' section is completely unsourced. -- Trevj (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 2 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Prime Minister's Award conveys notability as does court case. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:31, 2 November 2012 (UTC).
 * . Phil Bridger (talk) 21:53, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:22, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  00:21, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep after a rewrite removing or referencing the uncited material about his accomplishments in office---I am in the process of doing this.  DGG ( talk ) 04:17, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. DGG's cleanups make his notability clear. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:22, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. Good job, DGG! Bearian (talk) 21:12, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.