Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. Scott Vogel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Core desat 05:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

M. Scott Vogel

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability, unverified J- ſtan TalkContribs 21:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - nearly all I can find is from imdb.com or similar sites, which apparently are not reputable sources. In the absence of other reliable secondary source material (and that the article does not assert notability), WP:BIO says the subject is not notable. -FrankTobia (talk) 22:32, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I added a reference and some additional detail. Is he considered notable?  I dunno, I suppose... -Verdatum (talk) 22:33, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete on review of WP:BIO, I fail to see that "the person must have been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." (The source I added does not qualify as intellectually independent.) -Verdatum (talk) 22:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * That's a nice link you found, Verdatum. I hate voting to delete articles like this, but WP:BIO seems pretty clear. It's really up to the article's creator to source things properly. I think I'll poke him on his talk page and see if he can't provide an adequate source so we can keep this article. -FrankTobia (talk) 22:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete with no prejudice to re-creation with reliable sources. I've done an extensive google news search with many search configurations (+/- producer, +/- requiem, +/- Pi) (as well as generic google searches) and I'm not finding anything to meet BIO guideline.   Keeper   |   76  19:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 17:42, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.