Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M/V Amherst Islander II


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is clear that the ship is notable due mostly to improvements made during the course of this discussion. Star  Mississippi  16:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

M/V Amherst Islander II

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No apparent notability. Super  Ψ   Dro  22:09, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep (though it's close...) There's not a whole lot of coverage but there is some because the Amherst and her sister ship are the first electric, zero-emission ferries in North America. The technology is discussed at length here, here and here and an overall FAQ is provided here. For a ship that is not even yet in service (planned for April 2022), that seems like a non-trivial amount of coverage.Pichpich (talk) 22:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If the topic is in fact notable, currently its article does not reflect that. I believe expansion of it is required. Super   Ψ   Dro  16:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Actually, if the topic is notable, the article should be kept and improved regardless of its current state. I think the above coverage is sufficient to build a decent, properly referenced stub article. Pichpich (talk) 19:11, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - the vessel is due to come into service in a few months, at which point one would expect more coverage. There's no harm in keeping for now and revisiting during the summer. Mjroots (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep per sources provided by Pichpich. Sources can be added to the article if the subject is notable. Article content does not determine notability. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:28, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as per WP:HEY, now it is clear that it passes WP:GNG (barely), although I understand the nom.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.