Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M2o


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

M2o

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Procedural nomination. User:Pinum314 only added the nomination template, but did not complete the nomination, though also added the following rationale on the talk page: "Includes very little information and does not meet notability requirements." Keφr (talk) 17:13, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Based on the currently given sources (some of which are no longer directly accessible, if at all), my recommendation is delete. Accessible sources appear to be passing mentions at best, and WP:PRIMARY. Keφr (talk) 17:13, 7 August 2012 (UTC) [edited 17:19, 7 August 2012 (UTC)]


 * Delete: notability is not demonstrated and web search doesn't bring anything to support keep view. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 11:53, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete and this is why products should be part of A7 as well. Secret account 00:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Entire article seems promotional and contrived. None of the references (that are still active) cite the subject of the article directly and it's not notable on it's own.   Vertium '' When all is said and done 17:21, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.