Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MACO


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  20:33, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

MACO

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Entirely in-universe plot summary with no citations to any sources, reliable or otherwise. --EEMIV (talk) 11:43, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge to Star Trek:Enterprise 70.51.8.75 (talk) 06:04, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TravellingCari  20:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:35, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * merge as usual since no reason given not to. DGG (talk) 04:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * "Entirely in-universe plot summary with no citations to any sources, reliable or otherwise." - reason not to merge. --EEMIV (talk) 12:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete — to merge we would need sources. Stifle (talk) 15:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Stifle, we cannot merge information which is not verifiable.  coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  18:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not a very significant piece of the universe to deserve an article even with references and since we can't merge without them, delete. --147.70.176.164 (talk) 22:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per DGG. There are sources mentioned in the article; just because they aren't listed as footnoted citations on the bottom doesn't mean they don't exist. The sources are the episodes "The Xindi", "The Augments", "Borderland", and "The Forge"; and the novel "Last Full Measure". In addition, a published source for information on MACOs can be found as well: page 263 of Star Trek 101. Maybe it's not enough to satisfy notability, but there's enough verifiable information to support a merge. DHowell (talk) 11:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Limited coverage. No good reason to merge.  "no reason not to merge" ==/== a good reason to merge. Protonk (talk) 19:48, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.