Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAD's 20 Dumbest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 23:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

MAD's 20 Dumbest

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't show notability; only interesting for MAD (magazine) readers. Possibly fancruft. ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ Share– a– Power[citation needed] 17:54, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 12:48, 15 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Doesn't seem important. No sources provided and list is incomplete anyway. Karl 334   ☞ TALK to ME ☜  14:19, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 23:21, 23 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete and include in Mad's 20 Dumbest Wikipedia Articles - summaries of magazine articles are not normally considered suitable for an encyclopedia. Besides, it's much funnier in the original. Matchups 17:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.