Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAD Foundation (Australia)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. We're not rewarding socks with a seven day discussion when consensus is clear. Star  Mississippi  03:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

MAD Foundation (Australia)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Solely promotional. Fails WP:NORG and created by likely COI/sock. 0x Deadbeef 07:56, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Australia. 0x Deadbeef  07:56, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * "COI/sock" and " solely promotional"? I think you need to reasonably prove both of these pretty heavy claims. RGBLight (talk) 08:39, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * RGBLight, If I was a good faith user with just above 100 mainspace edits, I am fairly confident I wouldn't know what "COI/sock" means. 0x Deadbeef 09:10, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Well it's good to see that you're already making personal attacks at this point and not meaningfully engaging with the content itself. RGBLight (talk) 09:15, 9 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Note RGBLight is a CU-confirmed sock of, a user with a declared COI with this organisation. Both accounts are now blocked. Girth Summit  (blether)  09:41, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article had been moved into draftspace by for incubation before being moved back by, now blocked for sockpuppetry. Scrutiny-evasion notwithstanding, the body of the article does more to promote the subject (such as [t]hey fund medical equipment for disadvantaged children afflicted with disability and MAD features in Australian media through [...]) than to establish its notability. — Tenryuu 🐲  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 13:38, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOTPROMO article by confirmed COI sockpuppet. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:46, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Promotional and inadequate evidence of notability. Since they're willing to break the rules here, it makes me wonder whether they are willing to cheat donors too. --R. S. Shaw (talk) 00:56, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. The creator, who had prior knowledge of WP:COI attempted to game the system by creating an undisclosed sockpuppet, instead of following the proper procedure by sending this to AFC. This is unacceptable at all costs. &#8212;CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 10:29, 10 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.