Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAFIAAFire Redirector


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

MAFIAAFire Redirector

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Related to a single event. Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. Störm  (talk)  07:52, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:57, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:57, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:58, 5 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - I'm pretty sure WP:NOTNEWS has nothing to do with this article, as it's not an event or anything. The article just needs some different sources. Also, just because it is related to a single event doesn't mean that it's not allowed. Koridas  ( Speak ) 03:21, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep – it's low quality and low profile, but these cannot be reasons for deletion. It barely meets the requirement of notability, but still. delete – see below – K4rolB (talk) 12:55, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: This is a textbook case of WP:NOTNEWS (or non-BLP WP:ONEEVENT, if you will). The only mentions found in reliable sources are in the context of the removal request and its rejection. Frankly I am rather bewildered at the "keep" !votes above, and would like to ask User:Koridas and User:K4rolB to please clarify how this could possibly pass WP:GNG without so much as a single source that actually discusses the software itself. Modernponderer (talk) 15:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * When I first made my decision I looked through google search results and I got the impression that notability can be established, based on some articles I skimmed through. AFAIK, WP:GNG doesn't require any source to be mainly about the subject. Apart from that, I decided to actually dig through the search results (yeah, I know, I should have done it in the first place) to find something that actually proves it's notable, but I could not find anything. The end result is, I was wrong, I changed my opinion, it is WP:NOTNEWS. – K4rolB (talk) 14:31, 12 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.