Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAKUDAM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedily deleted by Floquenbeam as noted below. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 19:06, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

MAKUDAM

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Espouses fringe theory exactly copied from one of its references. According to the article talk page the user who created it also wrote the article it is copied from. He also created a similar article yesterday that was deleted as well. mauler90 (talk) 06:17, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Listed for AfD because the user removed my PROD tag. mauler90 (talk) 06:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. OR and Nonsense. Szzuk (talk) 08:03, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 08:46, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research: MAKUDAM is the Crown of the Lord God of the Earth, and the only symbol which represents GOD, who created through water, can destruct through fire and maintains what He created in perfect Justice and Truth, who is having the Key of Supernova to make a Black Hole. It is a word in malayalam language which means DIADEM in english. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:02, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete- Delete per WP:SNOW and WP:NONSENSE.   Raa   G   gio  (talk)   17:04, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Absolutely unencyclopedic. Possibly protect as well, seeing as this is at least the second time in three days it's been re-created. AlexHOUSE (talk) 17:16, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Also-- the user appears to have created a similar article at Symbol of Christ.


 * Note I've speedy-deleted the article and blocked the author; if someone more familiar with AFD could do the necessaries, it would save me having to read the admin instructions again. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:41, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.