Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MARKSMAN ENTERTAINMENT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-26 09:17Z 

MARKSMAN ENTERTAINMENT

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable corp, article by its founder with conflict of interest Dicklyon 05:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * DELETE TYPING like this all the TIME must be DIFFICULT. JuJube 07:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete if the article is not rewritten by the end of this AFD, for COI. hateless 08:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Also ALL THOSE CAPITALS ARE MAKING MY EYES GO FUNNY! Jules1975 09:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * DELETE, conflict of interest – Qxz 10:20, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * DELETE per WP:COI, WP:MOS and for failure to understand the CAPS LOCK key, (it really isn't CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL,) -- RoninBK T C 11:09, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * CAPS-LOCK DELETE per nom. Awyong J. M. Salleh 15:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:COI and WP:MOS. ALL THE CAPS ARE MAKING ME DIZZY! Sr13 (T|C) Editor review 17:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, salt and bite. Apart from the above, for this (a follow-up to this comment). --Ouro (blah blah) 19:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, PR puff. And CAPS LOCK fatigue. This is not what Wikipedia is for. Darrenhusted 22:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.