Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF NON-INTERACTING TANK SYSTEMS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 09:27, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF NON-INTERACTING TANK SYSTEMS

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article appears to be an essay. Ethanlu121 (talk) 00:36, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would say that you are correct. The subject of the article is a mathematical modeling technique for a very specific scenario, and while mathematical modeling as a broad mathematical subject would warrant article coverage in a general sense, there are very few cases on Wikipedia where a specific use case of it is given coverage, per WP:NOTTEXTBOOK: ([1], [2], [3]), and you could argue that some of those aren't fit for various reasons, either. Also, the article looks to be mostly OR. Tpdwkouaa (talk) 01:04, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. GabeIglesia (talk) 03:33, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  03:56, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. To narrow, non-notable, and WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. Magidin (talk) 04:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. Bazj (talk) 09:21, 23 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. As Tpdwkouaa explained above, we have an article for mathematical modeling, but unless a specific application has received significant coverage in reliable sources, it probably shouldn't have its own article. It appears that the application of mathematical modeling for non-interacting tank systems has received at least some coverage in scholarship (see, e.g., this paper), but a discussion of that application would likely be best placed within the context of the article for mathematical modeling (per WP:PAGEDECIDE). -- Notecardforfree (talk) 16:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete.When I PRODed this it was because "WP:NOTHOWTO. And is the topic notable. And WP:DYNAMITE. The article is incomprehensible. And a dollar to a donut it's been copied from a textbook." I think that covers all the bases....TheLongTone (talk) 14:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - In the unlikely event that this isn't a verbatim copy from a book or elsewhere, then it would certainly be WP:OR. Neither notable nor appropriate here.  Velella  Velella Talk 07:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.