Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAX (Dance Dance Revolution)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Although if someone wants to work on this per the concerns below, I will make the content available to you. W.marsh 21:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

MAX (Dance Dance Revolution)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fancruft, unverifiable, original research, you name it. Moogy  ( talk )  14:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fan/listcruft and definitely WP:OR in there.  The Rambling Man 14:25, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, 100% WP:OR. yandman  14:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Super incredicruft that doesn't belong in anything non-DDR oriented that even tries to be serious. It's also a gross violation of WP:NOT and WP:OR. Voretus 15:54, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not encyclopedic. may need a lot of adjusting to became an wikipedic article --Euzebia Zuk 16:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep on condition of major revamps This could work as an article, but as it stands right now, it's got one source. 'Dat's bad. -Ryanbomber 16:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep on condition of major revamps. I think this series of songs is significant enough to grant an article (there are other articles on DDR song series). But as it is now, it's just fancruft and repeated info from other DDR articles. Pi (π) 17:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.