Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MBF-P01 Gundam Astray Gold Frame


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:41, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

MBF-P01 Gundam Astray Gold Frame

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Plot only coverage. This fictional weapon does not meet the general notability guideline due to lack of coverage in reliable secondary sources. List of weapons in the series itself, List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED mobile weapons was deleted at Articles for deletion/List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED mobile weapons. Anthem of joy (talk) 15:26, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: The subject of the article, a fictional weapon, does not pass the general notability guideline and it is a plot-only description of a fictional work. There are no references in the article so there is no verifiability to presume that anything is worth keeping. A quick search engine test doesn't show anything to presume otherwise. Jfgslo (talk) 15:21, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't find any non-trivial reliable source coverage. Probably better suited for a Wikia project. Qrsdogg (talk) 16:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No references, no notability, total plot info, delete. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:46, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is not appropriate for Wikipedia. WP:NOT mentions the idea of weapons lists in terms of games, but it really is good advice for all toys and fiction. In general, these end up being WP:DIRECTORY style databases with very little context, and tend to run afoul of the same issue as WP:NOTPLOT. The spirit of policy calls for deleting this material, as does previous consensus at similar AFDs (see above). But if this is disputed, it might be worth further clarification (and discussion if necessary) at WP:NOT. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:41, 1 June 2011 (UTC) (note - same reason cited at Articles for deletion/CAT1-X Hyperion Gundam series (2nd nomination))
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.