Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MC Charlene


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

MC Charlene

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails GNG, and NMUSIC if we're generous to even consider it. It is difficult not to notice the glaring paid PR puffery coverage throughout the citations. Her main claim to notability appears to be her receiving the "Scandinavia Afrobeats Music Awards" - an utterly non-notable award. I found 2 other sources: a blog post about a music video she appeared in;  and another post about an event she went to. Now, considering the sources listed in the actual article that are not just event announcements or disclosed sponsored posts: &  what appear to be puff pieces about a visit to Nigeria;  another puff piece;  another puff piece, including the wonderful bit: "MC Charlene proved once again that she is the right host for your shows as she hyped the crowd";  what appears to be a release on her Norwegian business;  what reads like an event advertisement blog post;  photos of an event in Turkey;  puff piece with photos about an event in Berlin;  yet another puff piece;  one more;  and an announcement that she won non-notable awards. This leaves us with 3 very questionable sources that are at the heart of her questioned notability (and note that I seriously question the reliability of these sources): this one is a copy of the Poise Nigeria PR post;  A FabAfrik article; and lastly what I think is the single quasi reliable source of this entire article:, "Cameroonian MC/Host Charlene Slams Nigerian DJs For Not Playing Cameroonian Songs". PK650 (talk) 07:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. PK650 (talk) 07:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete – Poorly written promotional article. Not enough found on news searches to establish significant notability in my view. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 05:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete an overly promotional article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I so love the idea of her having an article. There are "secondary" sources galore, but, the majority appear to be puffy pieces that are borderline what we see with Bollywood sources. Missvain (talk) 19:06, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - the sourcing is shite - but I so want to see this on the main page on April Fool's Day. Bearian (talk) 01:51, 12 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.