Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MC Lazarus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete Mifter (talk) 00:15, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

MC Lazarus

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:SPAM. Article is entirely promotional. db-spam removed by IP editor after logged in editor was reprimanded for removing it. (Do I smell a sock?) Article is also a cut and paste copy of subject's Facebook page. There is some dispute as to whether such copies are copyright violations, as Facebook asserts that posters maintain the rights to their posts, but it is definitely overly promotional. No independent coverage found to assert notability. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:24, 13 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as typical self-promo and spam, full of weasel words.--Yopie (talk) 17:04, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, as I can find no sources that indicate that subject is notable. Not seeing this one, I nominated the album and single for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chapter One: The Prince Who Would Be King. The copyvio issue is not present with the album, so the debates shouldn't be merged - but they are clearly related, so I note the connection here. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 19:23, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this musician. Joe Chill (talk) 20:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - total spam of nn musician; probable autobio, I'm guessing. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  01:41, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per Joe Chill.--Epeefleche (talk) 02:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Clearly spam. An IP removing a speedy template is not a reason to progress onto AfD either. Rehevkor ✉  14:20, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.