Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MC Q-Bah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. G4'd. The Bushranger One ping only 00:15, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

MC Q-Bah

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Granted, the article is somewhat wikified and formatted. It can even be well written BUT this orphan article fails WP:MUSBIO, WP:N and seems to be a self-promoting article. Main claims to notability is interviewing Xzibit and Akon. Past tags have been removed multiple times with no explanation. All references are unreliable (mostly youtube videos) and irrelevant. Though, granted, they are well formatted. Good formatting (as much as it seems) does not confer notability to an article. -- Loukinho (talk) 02:17, 29 June 2012 (UTC) Loukinho (talk) 02:17, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG.  Sources offered are either trivial, WP:PRIMARY or lack evidence of editorial review sufficient to make them WP:RS.  Googling failed to turn up anything useful.  Msnicki (talk) 16:41, 29 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Also worth to mention that Q-Bah which currently redirects to MC Q-Bah has been nominated for speedy deletion before (Articles for deletion/Q-Bah and sneakily re-introduced as a legitimate article without any significant changes. Sneak was also the removal of the tags placed on the article multiple times before. -- Loukinho (talk) 20:54, 1 July 2012 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 13:47, 13 July 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.