Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MComix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

MComix

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Piece of free software to read images and comics. Fails the software specific and the more general notability tests. There's just no significant coverage in reliable sources. Pichpich (talk) 21:59, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 21:59, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 21:59, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Why ask for delete instead of redirect? If the rules call for MComix to be deleted then Comix (software) should also be deleted. -- 109.79.79.220 (talk) 22:39, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Do you have a good option for a redirect target? I see none. As for Comix (software), it's currently a redirect to MComix so it's going to get deleted too. Pichpich (talk) 22:59, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Before my recent edits: MComix pointed to Comix (software); Comix (software) pointed to Comic book archive. I don't see the problem with having a page for a small software project, it isn't like Wikipedia is short of space. I don't like it but I'd understand if the articles redirected instead to Comparison of image viewers -- 109.79.79.220 (talk) 23:52, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I could have closed this WP:SOFTDELETE but given the view expressed by the IP a firmer consensus seems appropriate.
 * Delete. We've come a long way since the early days of "oh sure, make a page for everything". If it hasn't been written about in secondary sources, it fails WP:V and we can't retain the content. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:27, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete A search yields a few sites offering free downloads of the software and a couple of perfunctory product reviews. Doesn't seem to pass basic notability threshold. Glendoremus (talk) 03:38, 4 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.