Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MEDASSET


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I appreciate 's erring on the side of assuming Greek sources are acceptable, but it was challenged by a Greek editor, and no further comments were made. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  15:04, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

MEDASSET

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Highly promotional article on an organization that gets only incidental coverage (there's a mention on CNN somewhere). Not notable by our standards. Drmies (talk) 14:57, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete WP:PROMOTIONAL and fails WP:GNG Burley22 (talk) 00:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Yes, it got a significant mention by CNN and I see similar mentions in several books, and they all seem to be the sort of mentions that build, cumulatively, toward notabilty of a conservation group active in a niche area for decades. Then, I see several sources in Greek, and notice that the group is primarily active there and in eastern Europe. I do not have the capability to evaluate the reliability of the Greek sources, but I think the sources taken as a whole are sufficient to keep this article. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  07:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not in depth coverage in Greek sources; mostly press-release-like articles, listings etc. ——Chalk19 (talk) 07:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.