Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MET-ART


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep - Liberatore(T) 18:35, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

MET-ART
Advertisement Dismas|(talk) 09:54, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm changing my vote to keep now that it's been re-written... If I'm allowed to change my vote that is... Dismas|(talk) 03:01, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Alan Liefting 09:56, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete agree with nom. JBEvans 11:04, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. -- so U  m  y  a  S  ch  11:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, because the article is an ad, but I think this site might be notable; I'd heard of it independently, and their website claims they've won awards for their content. Mango juice talk 11:06, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, advertising. --Ter e nce Ong 13:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep if rewritten. The site is notable, without question, however the article reads like an ad. OTOH, given its length, it can be recreated :) -- Grafikm_fr   (AutoGRAF)  14:01, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * delete all ADVERTISEMENTS! See the author's page, doesn;t even try to hide it Roodog2k 14:43, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * comment just for the heck of it, added spam tag to page Roodog2k 22:01, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * comment changing vote to neutral as the site IS notable, but I'm not sure what can be said about the site more than a sentence. Then again, being a stub is no reason to delete an article. Roodog2k 22:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Conditional keep that someone rewrites it. Site is probably notable. Kotepho 23:41, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep alexa rank is 495 . -- E ivindt@c 00:18, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy or Delete, recreate with better content and without the advertisment. -- ReyBrujo 01:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Conditional keep if rewritten. Otherwise, delete it and let someone recreate it without the ads. Somewhat notable, and gets a very high Alexa rank even for a porn site. -Sean Curtin 18:43, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Would support a rewrite, though. —Ruud 22:43, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and recreate per WP:WEB. This really is one of the most notable adult sites, and has won awards that are notable within that niche.  Alexa ranking Sunday night is 497.  Barno 02:49, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - I just rewrote it a bit, too - Met-art is an extremely notable pornographic website. Just make the article better and non-spam. Beltz 18:36, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:WEB. Stifle (talk) 00:00, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.