Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/METROPLAN Town and Regional Planners


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 06:12, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

METROPLAN Town and Regional Planners

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Fails WP:CORP, mainly sourced to company mission statement and SPS, no apparent outside coverage, not even in refs 5 and 6 discussing project the company is supposed to be involved in.  Captain Screebo Parley! 16:28, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → B  music  ian  01:46, 23 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete The majority of the sources relate to a Aerotropolis project rather than to the specifics of this firm's role as a contractor in that project; insufficient independent evidence of notability to meet WP:CORPDEPTH at this time. AllyD (talk) 06:57, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly insufficient notability from independent sources.  DGG ( talk ) 01:48, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.