Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MGM-Pathé Communications (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 06:19, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

MGM-Pathé Communications
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There isn't anything here that can't be stated on the MGM page. Freshh! (talk) 00:41, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 31 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per improvements and "solid consensus for keep" of this new article at the last AFD just last July. As was pointed out then, there is no need to overburden the suggested target with so much additional and well-sourced information... information about this unique and historical aspect that would then be culled from MGM as WP:UNDUE. When an anonymous one-day SPA IP tags something for a merge discussion, a lack of discussion tends to show a lack of consensus for a merge,  and a "let's merge it anyway" is not a proper deletion rationale. 12:13, 31 August 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelQSchmidt (talk • contribs)
 * Sorry... me... I failed to hit all four tildes.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 21:23, 31 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per the unnammed editor above MichaelQSchmidt - This was only nominated a month ago (Although I assume you had no idea until today), Anyway I have to say keep per MichaelQSchmidt's huge improvements back then, Plus also seems more sensible to have it separated as opposed to merging . – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  14:55, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep This seems to fall into WP:NOTAGAIN. --Jersey92 (talk) 16:15, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.