Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MICCI


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 09:00, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

MICCI

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unable to identify any significant coverage of this (existent) organization. Bongo matic  14:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. A quick google search brought up some promising media coverage such as this:, . And that literally took me one minute to find. Bound to be lots more out there.Nrswanson (talk) 01:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * There are lots of mentions of MCCI (I spent quite a bit of time sorting through them). However, no references that I identified included anything close to "significant coverage". Bongo  matic  01:45, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:00, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:30, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. There's adequate proof of notability, such as this page at Stanford University. andy (talk) 17:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The sources mentioned merely name the organization in passing and don't mention any sort of information that could be used to build an article with. - Mgm|(talk) 11:32, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.