Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MICRO (organization)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:13, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

MICRO (organization)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page possibly doesn't meet WP:ORG, furthermore, it was moved from AFC pipeline to mainspace suddenly by a fishy account. High chance of paid editing. Opinions for discussion are invited. ChayanSen (talk) 15:41, 26 July 2020 (UTC) — ChayanSen (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  16:44, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

PAGE ]]) 01:29, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, adequate sourcing in the article indicates meets WP:GNG PainProf (talk) 21:24, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, marginally notable per the in-depth profiles in the Washington Post and Smithsonian Magazine cited in the article, plus others found with a quick Google search including NPR's Science Friday. Ahecht ([[User talk:Ahecht|TALK
 * Keep Notable organization, passes GNG.  D My Son  07:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep since there are enough reliable sources supporting our subject's independent notability. The text, however, is in dire need of a major re-write since it now stands more like a pushy brochure rather than a proper lemma. It's right there near the minefield of destruction & resurrection. -The Gnome (talk) 10:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.