Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MIL-L-63460


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. While the discussion is only 2 to 1, the keep argument on the basis that this lubricant is the uniform industry standard for the US military is not grounded in Wikipedia policy. signed,Rosguill talk 01:57, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

MIL-L-63460

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:ROTM military standard. One among thousands with no indication of significance in the article and no WP:SIGCOV of the standard itself to be found. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 13:03, 14 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:33, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 13:03, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete seems to be an unremarkable lubricant, as nominator says no case is made why this deserves a standalone article. The number of the spec suggests that there are many many similar specs; do any of these have articles?TheLongTone (talk) 13:12, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * They do, I'm working my way through them. Most seem unnotable. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 17:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep agree that the article is not remarkable, but 'CLP' is the singular weapons lubricator in the U.S. military. There are many MIL-STDs, but CLP is the only weapons lubricator in use. Probably some editing might help this? Highspeed (talk)
 * Editing can only go so far if there's no secondary sources. There are many things that are the "only one" used, and most of them are not independently notable. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 11:14, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.