Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MINIs on the Dragon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) C T J F 8 3  21:34, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

MINIs on the Dragon

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails Notability (events). Ignoring the event's promotional website and anonymous blog posts, the only justification for this article is a short piece at Road & Track. The majority of that article isn't enven about the event; it's background about fame and importance of Deals Gap, North Carolina itself. It says 653 BMW Mini owners attended. That is a paltry number; typically recurring festivals of note have attendance in the tens of thousands, at least. A single article fails to meet the criteria of sustained coverage from diverse sources. Dbratland (talk) 21:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Motor Trend has an article on their site about this here . Seems like a good source. Also, the event seems more like an uncompetitive race than a festival, which would explain the low attending numbers. Lebowbowbowski (talk) 03:57, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. A run of the mill event on the Dragon (see this list, for instance). It might be worth a sentence if there was an article about "events on the dragon", but that could easily exist at Deals Gap, North Carolina. tedder (talk) 04:12, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, C T J F 8 3  20:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

--75.179.144.50 (talk) 17:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Since this is an activity at a well established location with numerous source and coverage suggest that this page be merged into a section of the "Tail of the Dragon" entry.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.