Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MITACS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

MITACS

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Doesn't appear to be notable. I couldn't find any significant coverage, and the article refs really only establish the bare fact that this company existed. Orphaned for a decade. Pepper Beast   (talk)  17:57, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Austria.   Pepper Beast    (talk)  17:57, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Definitely existed, but only provided trivial coverage about it during its tenure. W 42  18:23, 20 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.