Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MMA-Japan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Non-notable blog/website. MMA *in* Japan may become a notable topic, but this individual blog is not ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 11:09, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

MMA-Japan

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

A Japanese mixed martial arts blog. Fails to establish notability, no third-party references. Speedy deletion contested by creator. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 05:52, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:18, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:18, 26 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm unable to find any reliable sources covering the site, thus fails WP:GNG. Article also appears to fail WP:WEB.  --TreyGeek (talk) 21:02, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I didn't find coverage of this blog in any reliable sources. The article gives no independent sources and I don't see anything that would show this is a notable website.  To recap--this is an unsourced article written by the subject's creator that fails to show notability. Jakejr (talk) 22:02, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete unable to find secondary sources discussing the blog, let alone in any detail. Mt  king  (edits)  06:17, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Temporary Keep/Weak Delete Originally I was going to say "weak delete" and that I'd be neutral if the article were at least better paragraphed and contained a few sources. Its Alexa traffic ranking doesn't terribly justify an article for instance, but that's not everything. However, the article appears to have been only created yesterday . A little soon for a deletion nomination don't you think? The article should be given a week or two to develop and justify its existence first. If it's still problematic after that, then probably delete it. Beansy (talk) 23:11, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * DeleteFor the above reasons. The author (of both the blog and article) has made no attempt to address the citation issue.Peter Rehse (talk) 07:50, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep First UFC event in Japan makes this notable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.215.65.63 (talk) 16:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Barely passes A7. Not much notable thing done by the web and no ratings also. There are no refs to support the article and it is quit hard to find.  →TSU tp* 16:56, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.