Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MMA Pro Fighter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 04:24, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

MMA Pro Fighter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While there is some coverage of the game here, that is the only thing I was able to find from significant coverage in reliable secondary sources (from WP:VG/RS) that is not a WP:ROUTINE announcement of it's launch. Hence fails WP:GNG. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:03, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

'Delete, I can't find much on it. Seems like just another app game among many. Not notable as far as I can tell. Harizotoh9 (talk) 16:06, 24 May 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 01:40, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. I was able to add an Italian-language reference. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:23, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Just great. Not only the unreliable references in Ko Key Technologies were restored (a blog with no staff writing both of the cited articles), so was added an extra unreliable italian blog (which is admitted on https://fantagiochi.it/info-fantagiochi)., please read WP:VG/RS before doing things like these and trying to keep not notable games like these. Every game will get coverage on unreliable blogs. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:47, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Also Inside Social Games is unreliable as well as another gaming blog, even the first user comments are outright calling it so Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:50, 26 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.