Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MNP LLP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 16:45, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

MNP LLP

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not Notable. No Reliable sources. Citations are self-serving. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 23:03, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:00, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:00, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. MNP is the fifth-largest professional services firm in Canada and the largest Canadian-only firm, with over $500M in revenue and almost 4,000 employees. The four larger firms in Canada all have entries (PwC, KPMG, Deloitte, and Ernst & Young), as do the next two similar/smaller firms (Grant Thornton International and BDO International).. Given its current status as the largest independent Canadian accounting firm, the only Western-Canadian based professional services firm and its history as a nationally-relevant firm born in Manitoba, MNP clearly meets the notability requirements for a corporation. Citations listed as self-serving are from an ISBN-listed publication on the company's history, providing a valid source for the material (and for which truly independent sources are often rare). The historical information provided is of similar quality and detail as the Wikipedia pages of the peer organizations listed above. Agree that the page requires a wider range of independent sources for both current and historical content and language revisions for a more neutral tone. Also agree that the page is currently in development, but that does not justify deletion. Thanks, Yyzipedia (talk • contribs) 03:44, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - organization is clearly notable per YYZipedia. AfD is not cleanup. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 10:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * KEEP 4,000 employees; they would be notable no matter how mundane their operations are. CorporateM (Talk) 05:49, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep clearly notable firm. I think the nominator need not be reminded that WP:AfD is not for cleanup. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 23:05, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.